Full Video Labels: Difference between revisions
(add negative example) |
m (added unpaid example) |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
|Entire video is for fundraiser & can't be separated | |Entire video is for fundraiser & can't be separated | ||
|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPJKxAhLw5I Planting 20,000,000 Trees, My Biggest Project Ever!] | |[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPJKxAhLw5I Planting 20,000,000 Trees, My Biggest Project Ever!] | ||
|- | |||
|Features product from another content creator | |||
|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJnrMNCahxc Testing Another YouTuber's Thermal Compound!] | |||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" |Negative Examples | ! colspan="2" |Negative Examples |
Revision as of 03:28, 18 January 2022
Full video labels should not be used on every video or channel which is sponsored.
The label should only be applied if the entire video is based around or features the product and removing mentions would remove the majority of the video.
Even when a video is labelled as such, the parts that can be cleanly skipped should still be skipped but the disclosure should still be left intact.
Only one label is shown on a video at at time. The priority of the labels is
- Sponsor
- Exclusive Access
- Unpaid/ Self Promo
Sponsor
This label should only be used when the creator has been paid in money to advertise something shown in the video that cannot be completely removed by cuts.
This should not be used when a creator is given a free product from a company
Exclusive Access
This label should only be used when the creator showcases a product, service or location that they've received free or subsidised access to in the video that cannot be completely removed by cuts.
Unpaid/Self Promotion
This follows the same rules as Unpaid/Self Promotion
This should not be used when a creator is given a free product from a company.
https://blog.ajay.app/full-video-sponsorblock